Trial at San Antonio,TXConcerning Branch Dividians and deaths at Waco was before the USDC,WDT. A key matter of evidence concerned the use of an infra red recording systems known as FLIR. Arguments and questions concerned the FLIR capture of either gunfire directed at Branch Dividians at the of the siege or sunlight reflections. Experts testified that FLIR was unable to record sunlight being reflected leaving only 1 other explanation. Reported in common press after conclusion of trial.

1. Irregularities surfacing in trial on Branch Dividians.Testimony in civil proceedings USDC,WDT indicate irregularities in testimony on a FLIR recordings as described further down this page.

2. Walters v. Williams & Crownover USDC, WDT Civil Case: SA-97-CA-1313. US SSI Inspector General Williams pleads that the US is "soverign and immune" and can violate the law whenever it wishes including throwing away medical or disability statements submitted by SSI Applicants. Title 18 USC Sec.1512 (b) Question of tampering with victim, witness or informant where the civil case ended by requiring the Plaintiff too appear Stockton,CA at a Social Security Reconsideration held so far way the Plaintiff could not attend the hearing. Walters v. Apfel USDC,WDT A:99CA015622 Judge Sam SparksQuestion of violations of Title 18 CRIMES where a person holding Plaintiff's mail states he received threatening phone calls from the Judge and held up delivery of the Court's Order for 6 months to prevent an obvious appeal.Sec. 1501. Assault on process server Threats against person designated to serve processSec. 1509. Obstruction of court orders Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of lawQuestion of denial or due process and equal protection. Walters V. Apfel USDC District of Columbia Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668-Honorable Judge Robertson Presiding. Chris Walters question of due process and equal protection in requiring a resident of Texas to appear in SSI hearing in Tallahassee, Florida is answered by Commissioner Apfel with request for case transfer to Florida. Judge Robertson authorizes change of venue and case simply vanishes off the face of the planet. Question of violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt

5. Walters V. Viadero USDC, NDA Judge Clemmons Presiding: CIV NO CV-97-AR-1802-S Stamped Filed: July 17, 1997 9:40 AM. USDA appears by and through counsel in USDC and Judge Clemmons express no problem with Florida food stamp worker instructing a disable client with cancer to "slap a police officer upside of the head to get something to eat". Although the HHS Civil Rights Division and USDA Civil Rights Office have already received and acted upon this complaint the Court's Dismissal referrs to the Plaintiff's Complaint as "frivilious". Question of violation of Human Rightsdeferred to UNHCHR

6. Walters v. Freeh: NV96-CVS 892 HDM Walters v. Deatheridge USDC,EDC Misc 96-307 GEB USDC, Texans arranged a conviction without benefit of trialTitle 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of lawQuestion of denial or due process and equal protection. US Department of Justice became an active participant in efforts to maintain the conviction and worked with a possible terrorist group requesting what they believed to be "Anthrax" raising a question of Violation of Title 18 Sec. 175. Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons

7. Walters v. Jack Kemp: USDC, Oregon case asking questions about CSBG provisions by US Senator Mark O Hatfield. Litigation ended by running Plaintiff out of his place of residence in nonprofit agency where he was members of Board of Directors. Question of violation of Title 18 USC 1512 (b) Tampering with victim, witness, or informant for misusing a federal program to harass the Plaintiff out of his place of residence with the purpose of ending case before a USDC.

8. Walters v US Marshal USDC EDC 91-212 EJG/Pan(?) Service of Process by Convicted felon Jermone Smith. The Court could not reply to complaint however the principal in a federal crime did appear and harass and threaten the Plaintiff Question of violation of Title 18 USC 1512 (b) Tampering with victim, witness, or informant for misusing a federal program to harass the Plaintiff too continue stealing United States mail from a federally funded facility the Sunshine Place.

9. Walters v Espy USDC,EDC 93-1615 GEBAn administrative law question addressed to Secretary of Agriculture Mike Espy. During discovery members of the Oregon State Attorney General Office requested we inform Judge Garland Burrell if he attempted to honor subponea request he would receive a "severe fucking" Question of violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt Conveyances of this type in and before a USDC Court are typically pretty clear cut

10. Walters v Blessings 93-784 USDC, AZ TUC CIV Docket 9th USCA: 94-105180 Walters v Raiford USDC, WDT NO SA93CA11115 The Clinton Administration heavily involved in theft of food stamps from the elderly, disabled, and needy the cases were ended by acts of harassment of the Plaintiff and theft of the US Mail while case before 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals Question of violation of Title 18 USC 1702 Obstruction of correspondence The Shelter a homeless shelter participating in programs under Title 42 USC 11301 Homeless Act obstructed delivery of an Order from US Court of Appeals

11. Walters v. Interagency Council on Homeless USDC, Oregon Judge Redden 92-1631RE Judge Redden removed the orginal judge from the case so he could preside over the administrative law question involving the apparent request by Salem Rescue Mission to arrest homeless persons seeking work. Question of violation of Title 18 USC 913 impersonator making arrest or search. Judge Redden expressed no problem with prosecution of homeless clients seeking work citing New Orleans v Dukes and nor problem with convicted felon praticing federal criminal law in a church. Question of violation of Title 18 USC 1512 (b) Tampering with victim, witness, or informant for misusing a federal funded program by Mission Director Tom Zobel. Mr Zobel retaliated against the Plaintiff by denying him access to federally funded programs and another client they mistakenly felt was a friend of the Plaintiff Mike Kiffin during a cold snap in hopes they might die of exposure too the elements.

Questions Addressed Too
US House Committee on Judiciary
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington,D.C. 20515

Question of SSA Right to
Discard Medical and Disability Statements

Question of violation of Title 18 USC Sec. 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States This file cites a precedent of the Social Security Administration too throw away medical and disability statements of applicants because it stated to the USDC that it is "soverign and immune and has the right to violate the law whenever it wishes"Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of PowerDo the actions of Florida State, the United States Social Security Administration, and United States District Courts in this matter violate the spirit of this provision of International Law?

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Main Number (504) 310-7700

5th US Circuit Court Of Appeals
Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges-# 99-50174

Chris Walters  	)       Chris Walters )
Plaintiff       )       Plaintiff     )
vs              )               vs    )
                )                     )
Kenneth Apfel   )     David Williams  )
Commissioner of )     Crownover       )
Social Security )     SSI Inspector   )
Defendant             General         )
USDC Court Judge  USDC Judge Fred Biery
Sam Sparks        US Magistrate Robert OConnor
A:99CA015622      Case SA-97-CA-1313

SSA State It Is Not
Entitled Too Medical Records

WelcomeThe United States District Court Western District of Texas and 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals have set down rulings governing this Social Security Case and disability questions which your agency may not be able to deviate from since these precedents are the "law of the land" and rule of law pending a review by Congress....

David Williams The Social Security Inspector General and State of Texas both represented by legal counsel appeared via US Assistant Attorney General Gary Anderson and apparently claim they do not require and are not entitled too medical records which they threw away. The case was terminated by deporting the Plaintiff to Stockton, California in the words of a Texas State Represenative to make sure the reconsideration is held so far away you cannot attend the hearing and present evidence.... US 5th Circuit Court Appeal Before Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges- US 5th Circuit # 99-50174 declined to set aside the ruling.

Your agency or organization probally requires current medical records to process claim for service, however the current ruling of a US Circuit Court of Appeals is that your agency does not have any right to those records. I haven't got a clue on how you can do your job without medical records. When my GI Specialist Dr. Wright reviewed the actions of 30 odd medical specialist and numerous request for disabiity statements he stated his finding will be the final medical opinion issued in this case. Dr. Wright suggested most of the request for medical evaluation were frivilious because most of the doctors were not qualified to evaluate the problem and none of the communities involved followed through with the course of treatment prescribed by their own authorities:

At subsequent legal action in US District Court, Western District of Texas Judge Sam Sparks accepted the pleadings of Commissioner Kenneth Apfel that parties applying for Social Security benefits have no legal rights until the proceeding has gone completely through the extensive Social Security Appeals process and entered a USDC.

Report US Postal Inspector

Question of Judicial Misconduct
Involving Judge Sam Sparks

Obstruction of Judgement& Finding Claims to have obstructed delivery of Judge Sparks Order for 6 months after receiving threatening phone call from the Judge himself. Mark Walters Residence 40 W Sunset Drive, Kerrville, TX (830-792-3279)Sec. 1501. Assault on process server Threats against person designated to serve processSec. 1509. Obstruction of court orders Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of lawQuestion of denial or due process and equal protection.

5th US Circuit Court of Appeals
600 Camp Street 
New Orleans, LA 70130
504) 310-7700

Addressed Too The Honorable
High Commissioner on Human Rights
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
(41-22-917-9000
tb-petitions@ohchr.org

UN Human Rights In Issue

The Social Security Inspector General and State of Texas appeared in the United States District Court Western District of Texas by and through legal counsel in response too legal complaint filed by the Plaintiff/current Appellant. The United States and Texas pleaded that they have are "soverign and immune" and can violate the law whenever it pleases them and have the legal right to throw away medical records other relavent documents which by law the Plaintiff is required to supply in a Social Security hearing. The United States and Texas ended this appeal by requiring the Plaintiff a resident of Texas to appear in a Social Security "Reconsideration" held in Stockton, California which was held to be so far away the Plaintiff could not appear in time. The purpose of this violation of US and International Law was too permit the Defendant to petition the Honorable USDC Judge Fred Biery to end the case because the Plaintiff was absent. It is believed that sufficent evidence exist to support an investigation of the United States by the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights for violations of the following International Laws and Treaties:

Questions Addressed Too
US Senate Committee on Judiciary
224 Dirksen Building
Washington, DC 20510

United States District Court
For District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001
202) 354-3080

Chris Walters           )
Plaintiff Pro Se        )
                        )
 vs                     )
                        )
      Kenneth Apfel     )
      Commissioner of   )
      Social Security   )
      Administration  	)
Defendant
Judge Robertson Presiding
Civil Case Number 99-CV-0668

2nd Question On Holding
SSI Hearing in State Where Applicant Does Not Reside

This civil action brought under Title 42 USC 1983 questioned Social Security Administration right to hold SSI hearing in Tallahassee, Florida in September, 1997 in a state where Chris Walters does not reside. After case was transfered to Florida it disappeared off the face of the earth and was never heard from again.

United States Supreme Court
1 1st St NE,
Washington, DC 20543
(202) 479-3000

The United States Supreme Court has established precedents which defines the right of parties to attend hearings to which they are parties of interest as a matter of due process:

"Fundamental request of due process is opportunity to be heard at
a meaningful time and in meaningful manner. Matthews v. Eldridge VA 1976 96 S.Ct
893, 424 US 319. 47 L.Ed.2d.18
The absolute fundamentals of due process of law; are jurisdiction, adequate notice,
and a fair hearing US v Certain Parcels of Land in Price George County Md.
D.C. Md 1941, 40 F Supp 436 Fair Play is the essence of due process Galveston
vs.Press Ca1954,74S Ct 737,347 U.S. 522.98 Led.911.

Addressed Too The Honorable
High Commissioner on Human Rights
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
(41-22-917-9000
tb-petitions@ohchr.org

UN Human Rights In Issue

The Social Security Commissioner and United States of American appeared by and through legal counsel in the United States District Court, District of Columbia to answer questions submitted by Plaintiff on fairness and equity of Social Security Administration process which required Plaintiff a resident of Texas to appear at an appeal held in Florida States. After numerous frivilious request for extensions of time and United States petitioned the Honorable Judge Robertson to move the venue to Florida. The Court granted this request whereupon the case and file vanished without a trace never to be seen again. It is believed that sufficent evidence exist to support an investigation of the United States by the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights for violations of the following International Laws and Treaties:

United States District Court
Northern District of Alabama
1729 Fifth Ave North
Birmingham, Al 35203
205.278.1700

Chris Walters, 	)      Chris Walters   )
Plaintiff Pro S	)      Plaintiff Pro   )
               	)      vs              )
     vs.      	)                      )
Roger C. Viadero)      Judith McCall   )
 Defendant     	)      USDA, OCR       )
CIV NO CV-97-AR-1802-S  Civil No: 4 97 CV 279 MP
Stamped Filed: July 17, 1997

Question Violation of Human Rights
-Cancer Patient Instructed to-Slap a Cop to Get Something to Eat

American Disabilities QuestionBarbacue Bob: State Attorney General Bob Butterworth known nationally as "Barbacue Bob" for his work with Florida Electric Chair. Reportedly worked behind the scenes to help win Florida ruling for disabled cancer patient requiring surgery to slap a police officer upside of the head as part of his campaign against medicaide fraud. Florida State homeless shelter system does not accomodate disabled persons for instance the new shelter in Ft. Lauderdale has clients missing arms and legs pickup trash instead of participating in voc rehab activities:

Surgery for Cancer

Page 2 of Rambo Reno
FastCounter by bCentral