Rambo Reno USAG 1992-2001
US Department of Justice
|
Rambo Reno USAG 1992-2001
|
US Department of Justice
|
Requested By Senior Judge Paul, USDC,NDG
Author Chris Walters chrisw911@hotmail.com
Citation of Authority:
Title 18 USC Sec. 4 Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Assassinate the Plaintiff A Brief on Use of Terrorist in USDC System In June, 1995 I received a letter from Chief Judge Maurice M Paul of United States District Court, Northern District of Florida at Tallahassee, Florida requesting information for, Evaluation of Federal Court Management Policies by RAND. This brief reviews acts of terrorism, death threats, assassination attempts and other questionable acts which appear to be routine or common occurrences in indigent prose litigation. The review of these events in USDC cases will begin with a brief section on background of circumstances.
From 1986 to 1996 I did extensive surveys of social programs in conjunction with governments and private agencies in 15 states. The name of these studies or publication is CHAPS. At the onset of the surveys I was introduced to a HUD employee who identified himself as a member of, "Da Mafia" and explained HUD programs in Title 42 USCS 11000 were run by organized crime interest. A subsequent interview with Thad Stanuil, Investigator for HUD in 1990 in Washington D.C. I was told his department had been told to stay away from "homeless programs" by some "powerful person". In the course of doing the survey's in question it was possible to uncover what appears to be extensive evidence of criminal activity in programs relating to HUD and FEMA. The enclosed computer disc has extensive records of these matters which are too lengthy to print. Question of Litigation: The filing of actions in USDC began in 1989 in Oregon and continued into 1994. Most of the actions simply attempt by one means or another to sue a federal officer to bring the matters to their attention or possibly secure relief. Question of Relief: I can understand how to pickup the phone and call the police to report a possible crime. How to report possible federal crime or questionable activity remains a great and profound mystery.
Action to have HUD comply with CSBG, case management standards which Senator Mark O. Hatfield wrote based on CHAPS.
Act of Terrorism: I was living at CERVS a non profit agency in Medford, Oregon a registered voter, legal resident, and working at CERVS. I received a death threat from Board of Director Jerry Westgate (?), had my mail diverted, and was told I could not live at this location as punishment for having file this action in federal court. Matters explained to me in more detail by CERVS staff.
Walters .v US Marshal USDC, EDC 91-212 EJG/Pan Cause of Action: I was missing US mail at Sunshine Place in Modesto, CA. and filed an action to report crime involved to US Marshal. I sued the US Marshal to see if mail could be recovered and asked for assistance from US Senator Alan Cranston. I received a filing notice from the Court but never heard anything else.
Terrorist Threat Addressed to Court A Mr. Jerome Smith (Parolee) who handled the mail at this agency for Stanislaus County approached me and explained I was in great personal danger for trying to recover my mail and should quit my action. Another person also sent me the same message.
Sanction for An Executive Action Upon receipt of this threat I filed a document; Sanction for an Executive Action that any person threatening a party to an action at law in USDC could be executed and a $5.00 bounty would be paid for the docketing of the persons ears.
US Mail Recovered Assistance of US Senator Alan Cranston resulted in recovery of my mail which was diverted from United Way to Sunshine Place and seized. Recovered included voter registration card and letter from US Senator Ted Kennedy.
Received 2nd Threat I was approached and briefly detailed by a City of Modesto Police Officer Detective Fernandez who requested information about the matters in question. Detective Fernandez asked for my photograph, asked questions about some matters I was not familar with, and wished to discuss the status of the federal case in USDC. I advised Detective Fernandez he lacked any status or legal standing to practice federal law. Detective Fernandez seized my voter registration card and stated he considered the legal matters in issue resolved.
Action: In December, 1992 I was advised by a Dan Nisley a manager of the Rescue Mission in Salem, Oregon that I was being arrested or detained. Mr. Nisley took me to his office and attempted to read me my rights and proceeded to vend, dispense, and practice federal law in the setting of a "church". Mr. Nisley explained that I could not use Rescue Mission as a place to receive mail to sell my book or use the phone to receive messages as it violated the non profit status of the agency. Mr. Nisley did not explain how the mission could also at the same time operate a for profit employment agency for clients on the property using both mail and messages. I explained I was unaware of the laws in question and Mr. Nisley explained he would let me off with a warning and seized my property.
Legal Question Legal Question: As on those persons who assisted in creation of Title 42 USCS 110000 I am aware Stewart McKinney programs mandate clients to seek work or make efforts to assist themselves. I wanted to know how a shelter which receives federal funds could actively prevent clients from profit activities.
Removal of Original Judge The clerk of assigned a woman judge to preside over the cause. Chief Judge Redden apparently removed this judge and appointed himself to preside over the cause.
Threat & Assassination Attempt: Upon returning to the rescue mission after filing my court papers I received a written letter from Mission Director Tom Zobel which stated I could not receive access to federally funded meals or shelter as a result of my filing an action at law. Mr. Zobel put in a personal appearance and directed me to leave the property "forever". Mr. Zobel also apparently retaliated against a Mr. Mike Kiffin because he expressed an interest to working with me on my book.
Mr. Zobel was well aware that denying me access to the shelter, food, and facilities was occurring during a severe snow storm with temperatures in the 20's. Mr. Zobel's actions suggest a misuse of federal programs for the purpose of retaliating against party to federal action with a premeditated attempt to cause bodily harm or death.
Subsequent Ruling of Court Judge James Redden cited New Orleans v. Dukes that non profit agencies have an obligation to have persons arrested for using their facilities to seek work or engage in profitable activities.
Action: This action seeks relief from Secretary of Agriculture Mike Espy from loss of food stamps and denial of services by private agency vending USDA commodities in Oregon. Mr. Lloyd Williams of the Salvation Army in Salem, Oregon explained that Chris Walters could have not have access to federally funded programs as "punishment for political activities".
Offer to Have Sex With Court During subsequent discovery and pretrial activities with Oregon State Attorney General Office I discussed the subpoena of materials and evidence with State Attorney General Staff. The staff explained that any attempt to subpoena evidence into USDC in California in a pro se action would result in his office having sex with the Court's posterior.
Assassination Attempt Mr. Lloyd Williams of the Salvation Army stated that I had accidently been given a night of lodging at the Salvation Army and that I was actually denied services until the 3rd or 4th Generation or about the year 2300. Denial of services by Mr. Williams to federal food shelter, and other services places Chris Walters out in freezing winter weather with the intent I should die.
Removal of Cause Removal of Cause: Cause was withdrawn from docket to prevent any further abuse of Court, Plaintiff, and Defendant in civil proceeding.
Texas Action: Texas states I have open food stamp case and Arizona DES states I have committed food stamp fraud. Texas apparently refuses to close food stamp case of those who left the state. Ruling of USDC Arizona: The Judge William Browning dismissed to case citing lack of jurisdiction. Ruling of USDC Texas: Magistrate John Primo in his preliminary ruling cites the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that states have a legal right to refuse to close food stamp cases. Ruling of USDA. Judith Seymour of USDA, Food and Nutrition Service ruled that states must close food stamp cases when notified clients are out of state. Appeal US Circuit Court: Docketed at San Francisco various pleading filed in including statements of USDA that they are unable to govern their program. Act of Terrorism
Act Of Terrorism: In March, 1994 I was notified by a non profit agency in Tallahassee, Florida that a member of the National Homeless Coalition wanted to say hello to me. The agency went on to state they were holding, diverting, or withholding delivery of my mail apparently to prevent further litigation. I also received what appeared to be a verbal threat from another non profit agency which portends to come from the Leon County Sheriff. Order to Cease & Desist
Order to Cease & Desist: Somewhat later I docketed an Order to Cease & Desist to the parties instructing them that they could not intervene, litigate, or otherwise convey into a USDC case without prior permission of the Court. The Court responded by dismissing the cause for failing to complying with Court Rules. Attempt False Arrest
Attempted False Arrest: In October, 1994 I receive food stamps in Gainesville, Florida from Florida HRS. I left the state and directed a letter dated 12-1-94 to Gainesville stating I left state and to close case; posted Lordburg, NM. On applying for food stamps at Barstow, CA on 12-22-94 I received a written notice from food stamp workers in Barstow that they were notified I had an open food stamp case in Gainesville and Gainesville stated I already received food stamps on 12-7-94. I am not in jail or arrested for food stamp fraud a federal crime because I produced a letter from City of Tucson, Arizona stating I was working in Tucson on 12-7-94. Authorities were mystified about how a person could be in two different locations several thousand miles apart on the same day. Someone needs to get their lies organized better. Question Impeachment Judicial Officers
Proposed Impeachment Officers 9th Circuit: Made to US Senate Judiciary and US House Judiciary Committees. Questions the fitness of Judicial Officers to preside on Circuit Court Bench where such blatant acts of terrorism abound and frauds occur. Questions the fitness of Judicial Officers to preside on Circuit Court Bench where Courts refusal to enforce laws of United States cause additional (1) Food stamp frauds (2) Sanction of States to abide to USDA ruling and policies.
Cause of Action: The action is simply an attempt to report alleged federal crimes or questionable activities occurring both in FEMA and HUD programs and previous federal court actions. Neither the US Marshal Hudson, Deputy US Marshal, nor FBI could appear even briefly in USDC to accept delivery of 20 some odd pieces of paper, exhibits, or service of process on the United States. We also have service or attempted service on US Senate Committee of Judiciary and over sight Committees for HUD.
Acts of Terrorism: Plaintiff Walters was staying at a local non profit agency in Tallahassee, Florida and was told by staff of the agency in March, 1994 that the National Coalition For Homeless said hello. The staff of this facility also stated they were diverting, holding, and misdirecting the US Mail apparently to prevent an appeal and further litigation in this cause and related actions in Arizona and Texas. Another non profit agency apparently attempted a threat of physical harm against Chris Walters reportedly from the Sheriff. It is difficult to believe that Sheriff or his Department would actually bother to send such a threat by 3rd party. It would seem more likely that a threat if one existed would be delivered in person by the agency or officers. Ruling of the Court
The Honorable Judge Stafford apparently made a ruling in this cause of action which the clerk permitted Chris Walters to view briefly prior to Friday afternoon closing. The inability of the Court to provide process appears to stem from diversion of United States mail by the non profit agencies in question.
