UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
Chris Walters )
Pro Se )
vs )
) Civil Case Number A: 99CA-098SS
United States Marshal )
Austin, TX )
Respondent
COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
Chris Walters )
Plaintiff )
)
vs. ) Case A: 99CA-098SS
)
US Marshal )
Respondent
NOTICE OF VOLUNATRY WITHDRAWL OF COMPLAINT
Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris
Walters before the United States District Court, Western
District of Texas located at Austin, Texas too voluntarily
withdraw the Complaint and quit the action:
1. Changes, circumstances, and actions have
occured which do not make prosecution of the original action
feasiable as explained more fully in Attached Memorandum of Law.
2. The Plaintiff Chris Walters wishes to
thank Judge Sam Sparks and Assistant US Attorney Robinson for
their patience and assistance and ask the parties to note this
cause the related actions are located on the internet as public
access at: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/6238.
Respectfully Submitted By Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029
(830-896-8850)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
Chris Walters )
Plaintiff )
)
vs. ) Civil NO 1:99cv0098 SS
)
US Marshal )
Respondent
Memorandum of Law In Support Complaint
Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris
Walters before the United States District Court, Western District
of Texas located at Austin, Texas too voluntarily withdraw the
Complaint and quit the action to wit:
1. Walters v. Annan and
Robinson filed a USDC, FDDC , as a civil rights and
human rights questions has a broader base of jurisdictional
authority in international law than the current Amicus Curiae
filed for the United States Marshal.
2. Walters v. Apfel USCD, WDT
1:99CV0156SS originally a discovery document for
the United States as a question commission of federal crimes is
now action filed as separate civil rights actions in 2 USDC
supercedes the question of violations of federal laws under the
jurisdiction of the United States Marshal.
3. Walters v. Miller USDC,WDT
97-CV-1327 originally a discovery document for the
United States Marshal question commission of violation of CRIMES
is now on appeal to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
4. Hearing Before
Administrative Law Judge: Chris Walters reported to
the Administrative Law Judge in Social Security Hearing that his
extensive history of employment as a bonded employee such as
security guard, bank employee, ... has been impaired by the
"criminal record".
5. Walters v. Reno
will be filed shortly seeking compensation for civil rights
damages caused by "criminal record" in another venue
seeking as an original action.
6. Exhibit A:
The Chris Walters recently changed his email account for his
homepage submitted as for informational purposes in this cause
and the service provider Geocities is supposed to provide a new
password composed of random numbers or letters.
7. The password submitted to the Chris Walters is
"dieokn" is not a random selection of number or letters
but either a threat or a request by the provider to die.
Discussion On Merits of Withdrawl of
Complaint
Chris Walters certainly wishes to thanks Judge Sparks and
Assistance US Attorney Robinson for their patience and assistance
and questions on service of process on the United States.
Unfortunately, out here in the boonies where Chris Walters
resides there are no professional process services whose
expertise and experience could adequately serve the United
States.
The appearance of an unknown perpetrator in the proceedings
who rather directly tampered with evidence submitted to the Court
to submit an apparent threat or possible request to die
underlines the futility of further prosecution of this action.
The perpetrator apparently realizes that the court process is too
slow, remote, and complex to represent any threat to his/her
apparent desire to intervene.
Chris Walters believes we might be whipping a dead horse
here and notes a precedent for withdrawl Walters v. Espy USDC,EDC
93CV1615 GEB. A members of the Oregon Attorney General Office had
responded to request for subponea that the Court should bend over
and be the recipient of a sexual act. The action was withdrawn
rather than see the Court subject to further abuse or loss of
public respect.
The only way Chris Walters could continue to prosecute the
action at bar would be to ask the Court to bring in additional
defendants, substantially amend the origional complaint, and seek
qualified process server to complete service on the United
States.
Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029-1634
I Chris Walters the Plaintiff in the above cause to state
and affirm I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document and exhibit on the following parties: 1. United States
Marshal 200 W 8 Austin, TX 78701 2. Assistant US Attorney
Robinson 816 Congress #1000 Austin, TX 78701 3. United States
Attorney General Janet Reno US Department of Justice 950
Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 By
________________________this _____day of April, 1999 By Chris
Walters PO Box 1634 Kerrville, TX 78029-1634