UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN


Chris Walters		)
	Pro Se		)
		vs	)
			)		Civil Case Number A: 99CA-098SS
United States Marshal	)
Austin, TX		)
	Respondent	
	COMPLAINT






                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN


Chris Walters		)
	Pro Se		)
		vs	)
			)		Civil Case Number A: 99CA-098SS
United States Marshal	)
Austin, TX		)
	Respondent	


PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND 
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the United States District Court, Western 

District of Texas at Austin, Texas to Move to Strike

a.      United State's reply of  3-12-1999 is unwarranted and attempts to litigate where such litigation is not warranted.

b.	The Court should enter a declaratory Order concluding the Cause of Action.

As explained more fully in the Attached Memorandum of Law In Support of Complaint.

Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters, Plaintif Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX  78029
(830-896-8850










                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN


Chris Walters		)
	Pro Se		)
		vs	)
			)		Civil Case Number 1: 99CV-98
United States Marshal	)
Austin, TX		)
	Respondent	


MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S 
MOTION TO STRIKE  AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the United States District Court, Western 

District of Texas at Austin, Texas to Move to Strike

Jurisdictional Statements

United States District Court Jurisdiction is found under Title 28 USC 1331 Federal question and

Title 18 USC 4 Misprison the felony.  

Plantiff's Motion To Strike Pleadings/
Communications By United States and Summary Judgement

Exhibit A from United States Department of Justice, United States Attorney, Western District

of Texas  Assistant US Attorney R. Barry Robinson dated  March 12, 1999 requesting additional 

service of process on United States Attorney, clerical staff  Ms Vernell Everett, in San Antonio, 

Texas in the wrong venue.

Exhibit B is a simple 1 page reply the United States should file which is adequate to answer the 

cause.

Exhibit C: is a simple 1 page Order closing the action by the Court which shows both Plaintiff 

and Defendant discharged their obligations under Title 18 USC 4 Misprison the felony.

Discussion

Walters v. Miller, Crownover SA-CV-1313-97 delivered a Complaint on the United States and 
Texas by Service on the US Attorney which was replied to and is being appealed to 5th US Circuit.  
Service of Process is not required on a particular individual in the US Attorney Office as a point 
of historical fact.

A private citizen can call the police to report a suspicious activity or possible crime and they will 
show up.  It is not the place of the police or prosecutorial officials to discuss, justifiy, or explain to 
the citizen what if anything they intend to do which is just as well since the average citizen probally 
would be at a loss to understand the process.  Title 18 USC 4 Misprison the felony  imposes a clear 
legal obligation on the average citizen to report what they might reasonably believe to be federal 
crimes.  Chri s Walters received and docketed a great many email replies from Congress some of 
which were appended to the Complaint.    It is not the obligation of Chris Walters nor the Court to prosecute possible violations of Title 18 CRIMES.  Chris Walters has discharged this obligation 
on the United States, the United States should accept the information for whatever if any purpose 
it might serve, and the Court enter an Order that justice has been served.  

Respectfully Submitted By

Chris Walters
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX  78029-1634
(830-896-8850)


Certificate of Service

I Chris Walters, the Plaintiff in the Above Cause of Action have served a true and correct copy of the
foregoing document and Exhibits this  17th day of March, 1999 on:

1.	United States Assistant US Attorney
	B Barry Robinson
	816 Congress Ave, Suite 1000
	Austin, TX  78701

2.	United States Marshal
	200 W 8th
	Austin, TX  78701

3.	US Attorney General Janet Reno
	US Department of Justice
	950 Pennsylvania Ave NW
	Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

As done and state by ___________________________________Plaintiff Pro Se