Now Comes the Plaintiff Pro Se Chris Walters before the United States District Court, 
Western District of Texas  located at Austin, Texas in this Civil Action To Wit:

Jurisdiction: United States District Court jurisdiction is found under  28 USC 1331 
Federal question and Title18 USC 4 Misprison the felony which requires citizens to 
report possible violations of CRIMES to officers of the United States Government.   
The question of enforcement is a matter of discretion by the United States of America.

The United States Supreme Court has found arrangement of false criminal histories to 
violate the 5th Amendend of the Constitiution as cited Constitional Law 9 and Due Process: 
Constititonal Law and

Tarlton v. Saxbe(1994)11 165 App DC 293. 507 F2d 1116. case remanded
(DC Dist Col) 407 F Supp 1083.

	Congress did not intend to authorize FBI to damage reputation of innocent 
	individuals in contravention of settled common law principles hence, Congress 
	did not intend through USCS 534 to authorize FBI to disseminate in accurate 
	criminal information without taking reasonable precautions to prevent inaccuracy; 
	dissemination of inaccurate criminal information without precaution of reasonable 
	efforts to forestall inaccuracy restricts subject's liberty without any procedural 
	safeguards designed to prevent such inaccuracies to permit FBI to disseminate 
	inaccurate criminal information without FBI making reasonable effort to prevent 
	inaccuracy would be tantamount to accuse individuals of criminal conduct without 
	ever providing such individuals opportunity to disprove that accusation: reliable 
	and responsible performance of record-keeping function requires such reasonable 
	care as FBI is able to afford to avoid injury to innocent citizens through 
	dissemination of inaccurate information.

The Court also rules in: McKnight v Webster(1980,Ed PA 499 F Supp 420)

	"FBI has duty to request correct information from local law enforcement agencies 
	which initially reported Plaintiff arrest when Plaintiff informs FBI it's records 
	are inaccurate."The scope and intend of the law Title 28 USC 534 Acquisition, 
	preservation.... was clearly to acquire and maintain records on crime and 
	"criminals" for the good of the country.

The Courts ruled in: Menard v. Mitchell 1971, DC Dist (24 Col) 328 F Supp 718, remanded on 
other grounds 162 App DC 284, 498 F2d 1017,28 ARL Fed 248...( superseded by statute on 
other grounds as stated in Utz v. Culliname,172 App DC 67, 520 F2d 467)

	"File of arrest records is designed only to facilitate coordinated law 
	enforcement activities between federal and local government, that is, to 
	assist arresting agencies, courts, and correctional institutions
	in apprehension, conviction, and proper disposition of criminal offenders."

Cause of Action

1.	Chris Walters SS 261-90-6357 DOB 10-17-1950 was arrested in July, 1993 by City of 
	Dallas Police Department in Dallas, Texas in a case believed to be BNO  930054616  
	allegedly for stealing his own business from the Dallas Rescue Mission before and 
	arraigned for "burgulary" a felony  before a Judge McConnell(?).

2.	The charge bugulary was dismissed and refiled as "criminal treapass" and Chris 
	Walters filed a Motion for Prima Facia Dismissal mailed from Longview, Texas 
	which was apparently never answered.

3.	The City of Troy Alabama Police Department made a routine NCIC background check 
	in 1995 and showed Chris Walters his extensive "criminal history" including a 
	"conviction for bugulary" in Dallas 1993.

4.	A question exist if an extensive "criminal hisotory" and conviction were 
	"arranged" by unknown principals because Chris Walters has never been tried 
	anywhere for a crime as far as can be recollected?

5.	Chris Walters recollection is that he has never been tried for a crime anywhere 
	much less convicted and filed Exhibit A Walters v. Freeh in USDC, Nevada inquiring 
	if an error has occured in the NCIC "criminal history".

6.	The Administrative Order of the Court assigning Judges was intercepted and stolen 
	by members of the Modesto Rescue Mission apparently further the conspiracy to 
	maintain a "false conviction".

7.	Exhibit B Filed as Walters v.Deatheridge and Austin in USDC Eastern District of 
	California questioned if the principals had the right to steal the United States 
	mail was filed as Misc 1996 307 GEB.

8.	About a week later a Mike Rossman the "manager of the Roseburg Rescue Mission" 
	drove 500 miles to the Modesto Gospel Mission.

9.	During the next week or so Mr. Rossman went to lengths to explain he was a former 
	salesman of Anthrax for Hooker Laboratories and made subtle inquiries if such a 
	substance could be acquired from Chris Walters.

10.	Mr. Rossman and the mission associates are believed to be under control of a known 
	terrorist organization Exhibit C and D.

11.	Exhibit E Members of Congress have replied to initial reports under Title 4 
	Misprison the felony.

Discussion

A person of reasonable and common intelligence could surmise Chris Walters is not 
adequately trained, staff, nor prepared to acquire evidence against the terrorist 
organization in question.   The terrorist organization in question appears to have 
extensive national ties and masquerades as government or is quite adept at manipulation 
of government and a history of operation in State of Texas.  

Questions the Court, US Marshal and United States of American might ask:

1.	Did principals/ perpetrators created a false record of conviction misusing the 
	NCIC criminal history in Texas in violation of Title 18 USC 372 Conspiracy to 
	defraud the US or Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law?

2.	Did the principals  obstructed USDC Order and process to maintain the fraud,and 
	false conviction in possible violation of Title 18 USC 372 Conspiracy to defraud 
	US or Title 18 USC 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law?

3.	Is reasonable evidence to suggest the misuse of NCIC was used to facility an 
	attempt at extortion by the principals to make a request for "biological weapons'?

4.	Is there evidence to suggest the existance of a terrorist organization, motive, 
	method, and opportunities which masquerades as or manipulates government for it's 
	own purposes?

Question of Fairness, Equity, and Joinder

Should Chris Walters have to joinder a civil action styled Walters vs.  Janet Reno, Freeh, 
et all and tort for civil rights violations and question the constitutionality of NCIC?  
A question of fairness and equity might ask if the greater public interest resides in the 
prosecution of the principals and or bringing their illegal activities to a successful 
conclusion.

Respectfully Submitted By

Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, Texas  78029-1634