1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
3 Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
4 Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
5 Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
6
Chris Walters, )
7 Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil _________________
8 )
) Filed Nov 19,1996
9 Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch )
10 Defendants
COMPLAINT
11
12 JURISDICTION: Title 28 USCS 1331 Federal question pursuant to Title 42
13 USCS 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights and Title 28 USC 1988
14 Proceedings in vindication of civil rights and Title 50 USC 401 National
15 Defense Act et all.
16 CAUSE OF ACTION: Various parties inserted incorrect information on the
17 NCIC and violated Chris Walters rights under 5th,6th, and 14th Amendments
18 and other parties have attempted to improperly access information
19 designated state secrets by misuse of the NCIC Title 28 USC 534
20 Acquisition, preservation, and exchange of identification record,....
21 RELIEF SOUGHT: Amicus Curia Complaint by Chris Walters seeks correction
22 of incorrect information on NCIC, and to question the insertion and use of
23 some of the information on the NCIC and other matters concerning the
24 national welfare as addressed to both US Senator Orrin Hatch and Director
25 Louis Freeh and the Presiding Judge
26 Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters,
Plaintiff Pro Se
Page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
Chris Walters, )
Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil #S-97-0021 EJG/GGH
)
) Filed Nov 19,1996
Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch )
Defendants
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
3 Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
4 Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
5 Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
6
Chris Walters, )
7 Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil _________________
8 )
)
9 Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch)
10 Defendants
11 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT
12 NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF PRO SE Chris Walters before the Honorable United
13 States District Court, Eastern District of California in this Memorandum
14 of Law in Support of Complaint to Wit:
15 1. JURISDICTION: is found in Title 28 USCS 1331 Federal question
16 pursuant to the authority of and with Title 42 USCS 1985 Conspiracy
17 to interfere with civil rights and Title 42 USC 1988 Proceedings in
18 vindication of civil rights as cited in
19 Tarlton V. Saxbe (1994 165 App DC 293, 507 F2d 116. (DC Dist Col) 407
20 F Supp 1083).
21 2. Jurisdiction over rights to due process can also be found in
23 Constitutional Laws 318 56,257, and 992. As the Constitution
24 Guarantees:
24 Article the seventh [Amendment V]
25 No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
26 crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in
1 cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in
2 actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be
3 subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy or life or limb;
4 nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
5 himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process
6 of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just
7 compensation.
8 Article the eighth [Amendment VI]
9 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
10 speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district
11 wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been
12 previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause
13 of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
14 compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the
15 Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
16 3. US District Court Jurisdiction is found in Tarlton v. Saxbe
17 (1994)11 165 App DC 293. 507 F2d 1116. case remanded (DC Dist Col) 407 F
18 Supp 1083.
19 "Congress did not intend to authorize FBI to damage reputation of innocent
individuals in contravention of settled common law principles hence,
20 Congress did not intend through USCS 534 to authorize FBI to disseminate
in accurate criminal information without taking reasonable precautions to
21 prevent inaccuracy; dissemination of inaccurate criminal information
without precaution of reasonable efforts to forestall inaccuracy restricts
22
subject's liberty without any procedural safeguards designed to prevent
23 such inaccuracies to permit FBI to disseminate inaccurate criminal
information without FBI making reasonable effort to prevent inaccuracy
24 would be tantamount to accuse individuals of criminal conduct without ever
providing such individuals opportunity to disprove that accusation:
25 reliable and responsible performance of record-keeping function requires
such reasonable care as FBI is able to afford to avoid injury to innocent
26 citizens through dissemination of inaccurate information."
1 4. The Court also rules in McKnight v Webster (1980, Ed PA 499 F Supp
420):
2 "FBI has duty to request correct information from local law enforcement
agencies which initially reported Plaintiff arrest when Plaintiff informs
3 FBI it's records are inaccurate."The scope and intend of the law Title 28
USC 534 Acquisition, preservation.... was clearly to acquire and maintain
4 records on crime and "criminals" for the good of the country.
5 5. The Courts ruled in Menard v. Mitchell (1971, DC Dist (24 Col) 328
F Supp 718, remanded on other grounds 162 App DC 284, 498 F2d 1017
6 ,28 ARL Fed 248...( superseded by statute on other grounds as stated
in Utz v. Culliname, 172 App DC 67, 520 F2d 467)
7 "File of arrest records is designed only to facilitate coordinated law
enforcement activities between federal and local government, that is, to
8 assist arresting agencies, courts, and correctional institutions in
apprehension, conviction, and proper disposition of criminal offenders."
9
10 6. CAUSE OF ACTION: In May, 1995 Chris Walters received a NCIC
11 background check at City of Troy, Alabama Police Department and was shown
12 a "criminal history".
13 7. The Officer explained Chris Walters was arrested and convicted
14 for the crime of burglary in State of Texas in Texas ex rel Walters in
15 Dallas, Texas apparently aka BNO 93054616 from July, 1993.
16 8. A hard statement to believe in as much as Chris Walters has never
17 actually been in a civil or criminal court, never actually met a civil or
18 criminal judge in person, never had a court appointed counsel, never
19 attended a trial, knows of no trial transcript, has never met a District
20 Attorney in trial conference, never been to prison, never been probated,
21 or as far as is known has never been involved in criminal litigation except
22 in minor traffic matters such as Walters v John Doe aka Presiding Judge of
23 Weed, California USDC EDC.
24 9. Plaintiff Exhibit 2 is a letter to Ben Click of the City of Dallas
25 Police Department suggest that Ben Click and his officers, agents, and
26 employees entered into a conspiracy to convict Chris Walters of a crime
1 without bother of trial to avoid possible civil suit and to lend the
2 appearance of legitimacy to their actions (Cite Title 18 USC 241 Civil
3 rights)
4 10. To be more accurate Chief Ben Click, the District Attorney, and
5 Judge in Dallas denied Chris Walters counsel, refused to explain his
6 rights, refused to answer the Plaintiff Motion for Prima Facia Dismissal
7 and tried to assist another actor William Thompson of Union Gospel Mission
8 at 922 Park Avenue in Dallas, Texas to rob Chris Walters of such
9 materials as Plaintiff Exhibit 3, 4, 5 a representation for materials on
10 the internet at http://www.pp.pdx.edu/FAC/Safety/911.html and in Exhibit
11 a computerized book.
12 11 There appears other entries on the NCIC which do not appear to
13 be supported by the finding of any court of law and Chris Walters will
14 subpoena the "criminal history" so as to ascertain the complete depth of
15 errors on the NCIC and question their validity.
16 12 The letter to Director Freeh which is Plaintiff Exhibit 6 also
17 questions the possible misuse of the NCIC by an alleged relative of an FBI
18 Agency in Miami, Florida between 1984 and 1985 which is classified as
19 state secrets which will be discussed in the Appended Exhibit 1 a letter
20 to the Honorable US Senator Orrin Hatch.
21 13. Exhibit 7 Walters v. Freeh, USDC NV 1996 CVS LRG was filed as an
22 Amicus Curia, and a third party seized the Order of the Court, Exhibit 8
23 who apparently is involved in plots to overthrow the US Exhibit 9 and
24 another third party offered Exhibit 10 to receive service of process and
25 then decline to receive services.
26 14 Chris Walters ask in the Discussion what motivation the other
1 party would have to commit violations of Title 18 CRIMES, draw into
2 question the Constitutionality of Title 28 USC 534, Title 26 USC 501c3, and
3 engage in other activities which would appear to cause harm to the interest
4 of millions of persons as suggested in Exhibit 12 A computer book?
16 15 RELIEF SOUGHT: Chris Walters seeks to have errors on the NCIC
17 expunged or withdrawn and seeks guidance, counsel, and input from the other
18 parties what to do about other matters at hand.
19 Discussion in Amicus Curia
20 Amicus Curia means Friend of the Court and Chris Walters has no
intentions, motivations, or need to chase the United States of America
21 around the Federal Courthouse Building, however will ask a number of
questions:
22
23 1. If a party can't work up the balls to prosecute an action at law
in a Court, why bring up the subject on the NCIC as asked in Exhibit
24 6 and 8.
25 2. If the Magistrate Court dismissed a traffic ticket at Corning,
California why should the California Highway patrol bring it up on
26 the NCIC as per Exhibit 6?
1. 3. Is the function of the NCIC so petty that it's use is restricted
to trying to determine if Chris Walters should receive a $12.00 bus
2 ticket or the $35.00 motel bed at Troy Alabama, issued by the Police
Department a reference to Exhibit 4.
3
4 4. Is the function of the NCIc so petty that it's use in September, 1996
at Wickenburg California is to determine if Chris Walters deserves
5 the $4.00 food voucher at Circle K or the $5.00 McDonald's food
coupon a reference to Exhibit 6.
6
7 5. What right does the Union Gospel Mission of Dallas, TX have to
seize a letter from Governor Pete Wilson of California addressed to
8 Chris Walters in California, or similar letters from Governors of AZ
and WA Exhibits 3,4,5.
9
10 6. Does Chief Ben Click or some other party have evidence that a
trial was held in Dallas, Texas where Chris Walters was present,
11 represented by legal counsel, was present during pretrial conference,
has a chance to be present in trial before a jury before the DA and
12 Judge, right to examine evidence and cross examine witnesses,
sentencing transcripts, prison records or other due process to
13 show that he is not a conspirator in violation of Title 18 USC 242
Deprivation of rights under color of law as supported by Exhibit 2.
14
15 7. Should Chris Walters accept the statements on the NCIC that the
United States has tied information on its intelligence operations to
16 his so called "criminal history" in hopes Chris Walters will pass
along state secrets to Red China, Iran, Iraq, or other so called
17 "unfriendly countries, or criminal interest as asked in Exhibit 1?
18 8 Do the actions of the United States in misuse of the NCIC represent
a request to Chris Walters to publish information relating to a
19 technical process for Polaroid Identification process which is
believed to be a threat to the national interest of the United States
20 Exhibit 1?
21 9. If the United States does not wish information related to question
7 or 8 released as part of national interest, can you explain why it
22 is accessible on the NCIC related to Chris Walters and what if
anything you intend to do to expunge the matters in Exhibit 1?
23
24 10 Does the United States owe Chris Walters civil service compensation
since about 1982 or does the United States have any interest in
25 resurrecting the work involved which might poise a threat or simply
want the process forgotten asked in Exhibit 1?
26
1 11 Is there some easy to understand method where citizens such as
Chris Walters can access information on the NCIC about their own
2 files and ask Director Louis Freeh or his appointed representative
to correct errors without litigation per Exhibit 6?
3
4 12 Does the USDC system lend itself to abuse of pro se litigation,
acts of terrorism, and criminal activity such as raised in Evaluation
5 of Federal Court Management by the Rand Corporation or does some easy
way exist to understand process to curb abuse suggested in Exhibit
6 Evaluation of Federal Court Policy Management?
7 13 If the United States has a long term vested interest in Title 26
USC 501(c)3 non profits why should a non profit agencies engage in
8 various acts such as are cited in enclosed Exhibit 12 which draw into
question the constitutionality of Acts of Congress?
9
10 14 Does the United States really want to stick with idea that clients
of non profit agencies can be arrested for seeking work as in New
11 Orleans v. Dukes when Chris Walters can easily prove that many
agencies are engaged in for profit activities across the United
12 States?
13 15 Does the United States really want to have non profit agencies
attempting to vend, dispense, and practice federal civil or criminal
14 law on their property with their clients or otherwise engage in
activities which are violations of Title 18 CRIMES or have the
15 interest to cubr abuse found in Exhibit 11.
16 16 Can the parties involved readily see that sooner or later the
abuses of non profit will cause some injury to party to question the
17 constitutionality of Title 26 USC 501c3 as found in Exhibit 8?
18 17 Do the parties understand that a related action is filed in USDC
styled Chris Walters V. Deatherage and Austin which questions the
19 right of non profits to to write, empower, and implement their own
federal law and acts of terrorism in Modesto, CA have been reported
20 to US Senate as in Exhibit 9?
21 18 Do the parties understand that another third party is in Modesto,
CA asking for for information relating to a publication by Chris
22 Walters in June, 1976 on the subject of Chemical and Biological
Warfare which was answered by General Hairstone during the Nixon
23 Administration and disavowed use of such weapons by the United States
as asked in Exibit 1?
24
25 19 Do the parties understand that a third party has inquired if
Chris Walters has access too, technological capabilities,stockpiles,
26 or other means of such weapons of mass destruction or the ability to
1 acquire such capabilities and the third party might be seeking to
acquire such weapons capabilities for persons in Modesto?
2
20 Why would the United States release information of this type,
3 nature, or of this general description as asked in Exhibit 1?
4 21 If Chris Walters was one of the million of person who has
received a security clearance and or done some sort of classified
5 work for the United States; who really cares as long as the details
remain state secrets per Exhibit 6?
6
7 22 Can the parties of interest appreciate how easily Chris Walters
already has sent information through the internet to the US
8 leadership and if the United States desires publication of sensitive
materials Exhibit 13 asks how Fast?
9
10 23 Can the parties of interest appreciate how their actions, use,
and misuse of NCIC and other US facilities have created a reasonable
11 belief that some party is seeking some type of relief, has some
interest, but has failed to make the details clear?
12
13 Respectfully Submitted By
14 Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
15 611 West Church Street
Stockton, CA 95202-2333
16 (Message 209-466-2605)
(Extreme Emergency Contact John Wickham: 209-462-1607)
17 Emergency Email: JEWickham@aol.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
Chris Walters, )
Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil #S-97-0021 EJG/GGH
)
) Filed Nov 19,1996
Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch )
Defendants
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
3 Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
4 Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
5 Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
6
Chris Walters, )
7 Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil _________________
8 )
)
9 Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch )
10 Defendants
11 PLAINTIFF EXHIBITS AND INDEX
12 1. Complaint:
Page 1
13
14 2. Memorandum of Law:
Page: 2-7
15
16 3. Plaintiff Exhibits Page:
Page: 8-9
17
18 1. Exhibit 1: Inquiry to US Senator Orrin Hatch.
Page: 10-13
19
20 2. Exhibit 2: Letter to Ben Click Chief of Dallas Police
Page: Attached Computer Disc File USC 534
21
22 3. Exhibit 3: Letter from Governor Pete Wilson of California
Page: Attached Computer File
23
24 4. Exhibit 4: Letter from Governor of Arizona
Page Attached Computer File
25
26 5 Exhibit 5: Letter from Governor of Washington
Page Attached Computer File
Page 8
1 6. Exhibit 6: Letter to Director Freeh.
Page Printed
2
3 7. Exhibit 7: USDC, Neveda Walters v. Freeh, 1996 DVS 892
Page Attached Computer File
4
5 8. Exhibit 8: Petition for Warrant Arrest per Seizure Order USDC,NV
Page Attached Computer File
6
7 9. Exhibit 9: US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence letter.
Page Attached Computer Disc File Govern1
8
9 10 Exhibit 10: Third Party Motion to Join made in USDC,NV
Page Attached Computer Disc File USCS401
10
11 11 Exhibit11 And Study on Federal Court Policy Management
Page: Attached Computer Disc File Govern2
12
13 12 Exhibit 12 Computerized Records
Page: Attached Computerized Book: Children of
14 the Devil-Coverpage Printed.
15 13 Exhibit 13 Proof Service on US
Page: 48-51
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 Page 9
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
Chris Walters, )
Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil #S-97-0021 EJG/GGH
)
) Filed Nov 19,1996
Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch )
Defendants
AMICUS CURIA PROOF SERVICE
1. Filed With Clerk of Court through drop box 11-19-96 @ Sacramento, CA
95814
2. Copy hand delivered to US Attorney Sacrameto, CA 95814 office on 15th
floor on 11-19-96 at about 1:30 PM
3. Copy mailed to US Attorney General Janet Reno from Sacramento, CA downtown
Post Office; Cost $1.01 Date: 11-19-96
4. Copy mailed to Director Louis Freeh FBI from Sacramento, CA downtown Post
Office: Cost $1.01: 11-19-96
5. Copy mailed to US Senator Orrin Hatch from Downtown Stockton California
Post Office: Cost $1.01 November 16th, 1996.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Chris Walters Director Louis J Freeh
Plaintiff Pro Se Federal Bureau Investigations
611 W Church 935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Stockton, CA 95307 Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(209-466-2605) (202-324-3000)
Emg# 209-462-1607)
Emg email: JEWickham @aol.com
Chris Walters, )
Plaintiff )
vs ) Civil #S-97-0021 EJG/GGH
)
) Filed Nov 19,1996
Louis J Freeh )
US Senator Orrin Hatch )
Defendants
INTERNET TRANSMISSION
TO US SENATOR ORRIN HATCH
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Message-ID: <328BC675.49A@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 17:25:09 -0800
From: Chris Walters
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I; 16bit)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov
Subject: Questions Relating to National Security and Constitutionality of Acts
of Congress:
X-URL: http://www.zoom.com/personal/biohzrd/USC_addr.html
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------30161F5472F6"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------30161F5472F6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mr. Chris Walters
c/o 621 W Magnolia Street
Stockton, CA 9520-2333
Thursday, November 14th, 1996
The Honorable United States Senator Orrin Hatch
US Senate Judiciary Committee
Washington, D.C.
RE: Inquiry before USDC on National Security Matter and issues
affecting national Welfare:
Dear Senator Orrin Hatch:
I have asked to have you named as a party of record in an action amicus curia in
the United States District Court of Nevada 1996 CVS 892 LRG which draws into question the
matters relating to:
1 National Defense Title 50 USC
2. Questions about constitutionality of NCIC arising from frauds and false
convictions from parties motivated to misuse NCIC for illicit purposes.
3 Assassinate the Plaintiff" Evaluation of Federal Court
Management Policies by Rand in 1995.
4 Questions relating to the constitutionality of Title 26 USC 501c3 aka non
profit agencies a computer record relating to criminal activities in
these concerns is an appended exhibit.
QUESTIONS RELATING TO NATIONAL SECURITY
In early 1980's I was employed in San Antonio Texas on a part time basis for about
$20.00 per week at Instant Passport Photos as part of an intelligence gathering operation
involving the United States Postal Inspector R.G. Brown.
The group produces bogus identification for various alleged criminals, foreign nationals,
and others and maintains hidden copies of the identification made for intelligence service.
Most of the person purchasing identification are not aware their identification is produced
by the government for intelligence purposes. According to the statements of the "control"
the Instant Passport Photos is simply 1 of a chain of such entities collecting intelligence
nationally for a host of various local, state, and federal concerns.
The "control" states he his operation is owned by a Leroy Armstrong of Dallas, however did
not explain who his immediate supervisor is and provide an emergency contacts if a problem
arose. The "control" received authorization or sanction to conduct a research project with
Chris Walters doing the primary research on modifications of the standardized identification
systems used nationally by Polaroid Corporation and the standardized id systems used by
untold thousands of private, and public concerns.
The purpose of this research project also known as Ed Williams and Associates of Flagstaff
Page 1
Page Two
US Senator Orrin Hatch
AZ is too produce a modification of the Polaroid Process which might be forge proof and
make it impossible to reproduce and we did in fact experiment extensively with scenic and
sterographic backgrounds which might be very difficult to forge. It is believed some
subsequent inquiries were held with Department of Defense about use in military ID's...
Unfortunately, during the course of the year's research it was also possible to
ascertain that methods existed to:
1 Quickly and cheaply use letterhead, and business cards to produce Id
without need of a printer to produce a color card for camera in few
minutes for pennies.
2 The ability to use id in cover actions.
3 The ability to introduce holographic images without a laser ever being
present.
4 Identification whose lettering can be field stripped and reloaded with new
lettering.
It was not difficult to determine that weaknesses existed in the Polaroid
System existed which a criminal element or foreign government could readily use
in the United States on a very effective basis and that the invention represents
a considerable threat to the interest of the United States. During the course
of a year of working at Instant Passport Photos it was possible to determine that
the "control" has according to his own statements a long history of criminal exploits
raising questions of his moral honesty which made it unfeasible to turn over project
details which his organization had funded.
Bad went to worse when the "control" elected to attempt to gain access to the
materials through a false arrest by the San Antonio Police Department in 1982(?). The
arresting officers Detective Jacobs and Detective Castro apparently stumbled across
something he was not supposed to be aware of which was brought to the attention of Special
Agent Paul Hosslocker of Federal Bureau of Investigation. What he found may or may not
have been a threat to the National Security of the United States, however the two guys who
picked him up in front of the Alamo:
"Detective Jacobs: I'm a police officer.
Two Guys: Yea tell us about it we know.
The San Antonio Police Department placed questionable information about Chris Walters into
every access point them could find in the computer network. Under the brilliant leadership
of Sgt. Dan Jennings information of a sensitive nature to the United States was downloaded
into every computer network he could find which according to his own words included, NCIC,
CIA,DIA,........ The animus of the conspiracy initiated by Sergeant Jennings was to force
Chris Walters to give them some information which the San Antonio Police Department lacks
right of legal access might relate to national security as a violation of Title 18
USC 798 Espionage. The charges by the San Antonio Police Department were of course dropped
completely.
In 1984-1985 Chris Walters worked for Jeffersons in Homestead, Florida and the following
conversation occurred with Store Security Officer Gus Bolano:
"My dad is an FBI agent here in Miami and he ran you on the NCIC".
Your employment
Page Three
Senator Orrin Hatch
here depends on my knowing exactly what the details and type of work you did which was
classified. You can tell me I'm applying for work as an FBI Agent and as good as cleared
top secret."
The animus of this conspiracy according to the principal is to access what he believes
are classified materials or information using the NCIC and a relative to commit a probable
violation of Title 18 USC 798 Espionage.
Questions?
1 I was physically separated from the "control" by an arrest by the San Antonio Police
Department without formal dismissal from government service;
a. Am I entitled to backpay or benefits under civil service?
b Should a description of the process in question be given to some
person, who and tell them to bring their own camera and equipment.
c Does the government have an interest in having this information on
the the NCIC and if so would you like me to put it on the internet
or take it back to some third country such as a foreign government?
QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE NCIC?
A brief glance at the NCIC "criminal history" made an instant believer
in me that the current process is ridden with unlimited potential for abuse.
1 Can Congress create an easy to understand method where citizens can get
access to what is in their own files without suing Director Freeh.
2. Can Congress create an easy to understand method for review of the
accuracy of and possible errors on the record without suing Director Freeh.
QUESTIONS RELATING TO EVALUATION OF FEDERAL COURT
MANAGEMENT BY RAND
One of the fastest ways to apply for assassination, harassment, or general abuse in
these United States is to file a pro se cause in a United States District Court. Right
here in this court we have had a non party seize and interdict a Federal Court Order and
have to file an original action in USDC in Sacramento, CA. Abuse of pro se causes includes
practice of federal criminal
law in churches, half hearted assassination attempts, having persons thrown out of their
residences, theft of US mail, offer of $5.00 bounty for ears of terrorist, offer to have
sex with USDC, EDC for asking for legal documents, and a variety of other interesting
matters as suggested by questions:
1. How will it be before some of the millions of indigent realize the Courts
have sanctioned terrorism and decide to do something beyond complain on
paper?
2. Is there a way that Congress can create an oversight process to curb this
type of abuse?
Page Four
US Senator Orrin Hatch
QUESTIONS RELATED TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
TITLE 26 USC 501C3 Exemption of certain trust and corporations.....
The enclosed computer disc contains the Z files which can be unzipped and
most can be read in ASCDOSII or imported into any IBM Word Processor by any competent
clerical person. The Zfiles are a years long studies of social services or non profit
operations throughout 12 states and an attempt to learn why things do or don't work.....
As a literary work certainly you might agree everyone under the sun will derive their own
conclusions as to the meaning of the results. Some information and data being seen draws
into question the Constitutionality of Title 26 USC 501c3 from areas of liability that the
Senate Judiciary Committee might be unaware exist.
The Act of Congress does contain protection against non profit agencies seeking to
engage in for profit activities and protection against partisan political activities. You
may be unaware that some non profits are engaged as suggested in the filed in:
1 Writing, empowering, enacting their own federal laws.
2. Practice of federal criminal and civil law in their non profits.
3. Easily observable violations of provisions of Title 18 CRIMES which often
violate the civil rights of clients and create legal means for persons to
sue law out of existence.
Respectfully Submitted By
Chris Walters
621 W Magnolia Street
Stockton, CA 95203-2333
Messages (209-66-2605)
(Extreme Emg: 209-462-1607)
email: JEWickham@aol.com
--------------30161F5472F6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="1INTRODU"
Mr. Chris Walters
1417 Deharro
Modesto, CA 95354
Thursday, October 31st, 1996
The Honorable United States Senator Orrin Hatch
Chairman of US Senate Judiciary Committee
Washington, D.C. 20515
RE: Questions raised USDC; Constitutionality Title 28 USC 534 aka NCIC,
Title 26 USC 501 (c)3, Title 7 USC Food Stamps....
Dear Chairman and Senator Orrin Hatch:
This action at law before the United States District Court, Nevada was filed in
Amicus Curia, Chris Walters v. Louis Freeh CVS 892HRM (Exhibit 1) to question fradulent
entires made on NCIC. A third party seized and refused to deliver Court Process (Exhibit 2)
here in Modesto and a Petition to Warrant Arrest Postmaster et all, Obstruction of Court
Process has drawn into question the constitutionality of Title 25 USC 501(c)3 and rights of
nonprofit agencies to interfere with free speech and 5th Amendment and 6th Amendment rights
of their clients. A personal letter (Exhibit 3) to Director Louis Freeh on Thursday, October
24th, 1996 offered Amended Complaint pursuant to the precedent McKnight v. Webster (1980 Ed,
PA. 499 F Supp 420) to correct the error on NCIC. The obstruction of court process and
failure or refusal of Director Louis Freeh to act requires Chris Walters to file action at
law in USDC to question the legaltiy of Title 28 USC 534 and Title 26 USC 501 (c)3.....
During the course of proceeding here in USDC, Nevada a third party moved to Join Third
Party Complaint (Exhibit 4) who is known as Hormoz Shamoeil of 3100 Whitmore, Apt 43, Ceres,
CA 95307 (209-538-8928) who filed pursuant to Title 42 USC 1986, Title 42 USC 1987
Prosecution of violations of certain laws and Title 42 USC 1988 asking for civil damages or
criminal damages from Chris Walters if no legal assistance is provided and pursuant to Title
4 USC Misprison the felony and seeks relief from Director Freeh, US Magistrate, US Attorney...
to defend his legal right to freedom of Religion and freedom from ethnic persecution.
Mr. Shamoeil states in his Complaint that an actor or Principal entered the
United States under false pretense and made false statements to Immigration and Naturalization
Service, and that the party has praticed spy craft, and may or may not be a Foreign Intelligence
Officer of Country of Iran. The actor or principal
as far as can be established in an emergency inquiry did not file Complaints against Mr. Shamoeil
with local Police Department and District Attorney to seek benefits of lawful protection. It
appears the actor or Principal engaged in a series of covert actions to attack Mr. Shamoeil in
directing Complaints to Food Stamp Worker, Gain Program, low income housing, and other 3 parties;
the animus of the action being to persecute Mr. Shamoeil for his religion and Assyrian heritage.
You are probally aware the Secretary of Agriculture has errected a Notice entitled AND
JUSTICE FOR ALL in all places vending food stamps which very plainly states that no person shall
be persecuted or abused in USDA programs on account
Page Two
US Senator Orrin Hatch
of their race, religion, or national orgin. From Mr. Shamoeil Complaint it is apparent various
parties in Stanislaus County were led like lambs to the slaughter to aid, abett, and conspire
with actor or Principal to violate Mr. Shamoeil's right and become unwitting or witting actors
or Principals themselves. It is apparent that Mr. Shamoeil has adequate legal grounds to file
an action at law in USDC seeking to declare Title 7 USC 2011 Food stamps, the Gain Program, and
laws related to low income housing unconstitutional without much problem. Mr. Shamoeil's Complaint
filed in the USDC state the actors/Principals are in violation of Title 18 CRIMES and has pleaded
to this too all parties.
Given the serious nature of the matters at hand I typed Complaints, Memorandum and pleadings
under the direction of Mr. Shamoeil and he has pleaded to become the person to recieve legal process
in Walters v. Freeh and as such been afforded some lawful protection from abuse which was filed in
USDC Nevada as Exhibit 3.
Mr. Shamoeil further directed me to Amend his Complaint and serve the United States Attorney,
Criminal Divison at Fresno (Exhibit 4), Resident Agent of Federal Bureau of Investigation in Modesto
at noon October 29th, 1996; and other appropriate law enforcement authorities pursuant to Title 42 USC
1987 Prosecution of violations of certain laws. It was further possible to ascertain that Father Mark
Wagner of St. Jude Catholic Church in Ceres, CA (209-537-0516) is acquiring Counsel at Law for Mr.
Shamoeil who will be a member of the California Bar. Given Mr. Shamoeil's desire to relent to receive
process and his having all the legal aid and assistance to which he is entitled and having lawfully
Complained to authorities and Officers of the USDC in Eastern District of California, Chris Walters
has filed the proceeding document Plaintiff's Petition to Warrant Arrest Movant Third Party Join and
Complaint for violation Title 18 USC 401 Contempt for obstruction of Court Process.
A new Complaint Walters v. Freeh will be filed in USDC challenging the constitutionality of Title
28 USC and Title 26 USC 501 (c)3 to ask for arrest of principals, and conspirators and seek substantial
damages for Chris Walters for loss of civil rights under 5th, 6th and 14 Amendment as it relates to misuse
of NCIC. Congress might elect to rewrite laws relating to NCIC and Non Profit or simpy decide that the
potential abuse is too server in related or similar causes known as Filegate. Alternately, Director Freeh
or others might simply expunge NCIC of incorrect information and thereby let us end all the actions.
It seems certain that after Congress rewrite Title 7 USC 2011 Food Stamps, Gain Program, Low
Income Housing Laws, and 20 million persons express their displeasure that they must go hungry becuase
food stamp act is declared unconstitutional that Congress will have a long and fruitful discussion with
the various actors, conspirators, and other responsible parties who came up with the great idea to use
these programs to abuse another person becuase he of his heritage or religious beliefs. It is not
possible to know at this time if Mr. Shamoeil's claims are meritorious or the result of a fraud or conspiracy.
Prepared By Chris Walters
Plaintiff Pro Se
REPLY FROM SENATOR HATCH
From: senator hatch
Received: from m1.boston.juno.com (m1.boston.juno.com
[205.231.100.199])by m2.boston.juno.com (8.6.13/8.7.Alpha.4/1.34.kim) with
ESMTP id OAA19300 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 1996
14:47:12 -0500
Received: from gateway.senate.gov (gateway.senate.gov
[199.95.76.2])by m1.boston.juno.com (8.6.13/8.7.Alpha.4/1.34.kim) with
SMTP id OAA11399 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 1996
14:47:11 -0500
Received: from [156.33.203.30] by gateway.senate.gov;
(5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/14Sep94-0947PM)
id AA04424; Tue, 19 Nov 1996 14:58:51 -0500
Received: from mailexc2.senate.gov by mailhost.senate.gov id
aa21804;
19 Nov 96 14:42 EST
Received: from ccMail by mailexc2.senate.gov
(IMA Internet Exchange 2.03 (Beta 1) Enterprise) id
00013263; Tue, 19 Nov 96 14:44:11 -0500
Return-path:
mailexc2.senate.gov:senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov>
To: Chris Walters
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 14:42:55 -0500
Subject: Rule: Re: Questions Relating to National Security
and Consti
Message-ID: <00013263.1947@hatch.senate.gov>
X-Status: Read
Dear Friend:
Thank you for your recent Internet e-mail message to my office. Please
accept this response as an indication that I have received your message and
will note your comments.
Unfortunately, due to time and resource limitations, I am unable to reply to
your message by e-mail. Those seeking information or asking questions who
are Utah constituents and who have included a complete postal address in
their message will receive a reply via U.S. Mail as soon as possible.
If you did not include a postal address in your initial email and you would
like a response from me, please resend your complete, original message along
with your Utah address.
Again, I appreciate hearing from you. Please continue to keep me informed
on issues of importance to you.
Sincerely,
Orrin G. Hatch
United States Senator
