Question of Unauthorized Persons
Praticing in Title 18 CRIMES

1. The current and accepted pratice of Title 7 USC 2011 food stamps is that the Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny are to read the food stamp applicant his "legal rights" a Miranda type warning including alleged extensive penalities for criminal violations which apparently refer to Title 18 Crimes for possible program violations of up to 20 years.....

2. Title 28 USC 1331 Federal questionA question as to the constitutionality of Title 7 USC 2011 food stamps involving false arrest, due process and equal protection guarantees by the 5th Amendment immediately comes into question as to wheather either Ms.Custer or Ms. Penny have been somehow empowered to act in the same capacity as Special Officers of the US Department of Justice?

3. Have the Officers of the United States District Court erred in permiting Title 7 USC 2011 food stamps to appoint mere case workers in Forsyth County to act as "Defacto Officers of the Court" and attempt to issue Miranda Warnings to other private citiziens in possible violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?

4. Have Officers of the United States District Court erred in permitting federal civil and criminal law to be praticed in a place not designated as a federal courthouse a possible violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?

5. Have Officers of the United States District Court and US Department of Agriculture erred in permitting Forsyth County or North Carolina to produce their own legal notice since all instrumentalities of law must have the seal of Federal Authority issuing a Notice, the name of the issuing party and particular statutes being cited.

Question of Violation
of Miranda Warnings

1. It appears for instance that the current food stamp application in use is rather vague and simply attempts to mumble some vague information in reference to Title 18 CRIMES but neglect to mention for instanceTitle 18 USC 371 Conspiracy to defraud the US nor does it display the Seal of US Department of Justice as required by law.

2. Title 28 USC 1331 Federal question A question as to the constitutionality of Title 7 USC 2011 Food stamps occurs where by the due process and equal protection of the law are bypassed where State or County simply manufactured their own "legal notice".

3. Having vended, dispensed, and praticed federal criminal law with the Chris Walters; both Mrs. Custer and Mrs. Penny asked if Chris Walters understood his"rights" and advised him if he did not he could seek legal counsel from the "Legal Aid Society" and Chris Walters signed the application for food stamps that he understood his rights

4. If Chris Walters however did not understand his rights fully Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny acting in their role as "Officers of the Court" have substituted adequate legal counsel by a member of the Federal Bar with the "Legal Aid Society" which we are given to understand does not pratice federal criminal law or appear in any criminal proceeding an obvious challenge to US Supreme Court rulings such as Miranda.

5. Have Officers of the United States District Court again erred by permitting Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny to essentially complete an arrest process and begin an interrogation in possible violation of Impersonator making arrest or search ?

6. Title 28 USC 1331 Federal question A question of constitutionality of Title 7 USC 2011 food stamps occurs here where the construction and administration of the food stamp law requires mere citizens to vend, dispense, and pratice federal criminal law in violation of both the US Codes and the equal protection and due process clause of the 5th and 14th Amendments.

Question of Status
As Investigative Officers of the Court

1. "Notice of Action Taken" on Form DSS 8592 issued on or about 9-17-2001 by Ms. Custer in food stamp case 946371012 authorized Chris Walters to receive up to $130.00 a month in food stamp benefits through 11/01/2001.

2. Ms. Penny issued a "Notice" in medicade claim 161526 on 9-17-01 that Chris Walters disability statement was only temporarily adequate and "We need proof of your application with social security for disability benefits" requested on Form D MA 8146A.

3. Both Ms. Penny and Ms. Custer are again cast into roles as "Defacto Officers of the Court" having entered into the investigative phase in the same manner as a investigation for instance by an Officer of the US Department of Justice, US Marshal, or Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigations and as Chris Walters recalls have requested a "Federal Privacy Waiver".

4. Have Officers of the Court again erred in permitting Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny to launch an apparent interstate investigation in to statements made by Chris Walters?

5. Have Officers of the Court erred in permitting Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny to compel Chris Walters to file an application for Social Security and what United States Statutes exist which provide for states to compel such actions since no such authority is cited?

Question of Contempt
of Federal and US Circuit Courts

1. Exhibit B "Appellants Reply to North Carolina's Interrogatory" Chris Walters identified himself as Appellant Pro SE Chris Walters in Walters v, Social Security Commissioner as a citation of authority pursuant Title 1 Sec. 204. Codes and Supplements as evidence of the laws of United States.

2. Chris Walters identified the questions of law as residing in several United States District Courts, US Courts of Appeals; and removed to the US House and US Senate Judiciary Committees pursuant too Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing on or about 1Pm 10-8-2001 by legal instrument and Proof of Service

3. Chris Walters cites the Order of United States District Court Judge Sam Sparks issued Walters v. Commissioner Kenneth Apfel USDC WDT A- 99-CV-0156SS in several federal court actions requested by the Social Security Administration that it is not entitled to Chris Walters medical records or disability statements.

4. The question of exactly how persons such as Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny not to mention Social Security employees would process disability questions without medical records or State Disability findings has in fact been directed in a timely and lawful manner to the US Senate and House Judiciary.

5. Neither Ms. Custer, Ms. Penny nor any other "Officer of the United States District Court" can affect a remedy lacking a standing to over rule the Honorable US District Judge Fred Biery, Honorable Judge Sam Sparks, or US Appellant Judges Before Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges- US 5th Circuit # 99-50174 and in fact the Social Security Commissioner or Congress can prosecute anyone tampering with their organizations pursuant to Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees .

6. Exhibit BAppellant Chris Walters explained further that Ms. Custer and Ms. Penny are not to further vend, dispense, or attempt to pratice federal law with Chris Walters or make any further legal conveyances too Chris Walters but to direct any questions to the United States Attorney or Magistrate.

7. Have Officers of the Court erred in permitting Ms Penny to instruct Chris Walters to contact Social Security Officals since the Federal Rules of Appellant Procedure already cover communications between counsel and other parties.

8. A Courtsey "Motion To Strike" was in fact served on the United States Attorney at 251 Main Street, Winston Salem, North Carolina 10-9-2001

9. Having identified himself as an pro se "Officer of the Court" Chris Walters located and identified his complete medical history including disability statments from Washington, Texas, Florida, Arizona and about 55 medical sources dating from 1997 and caused to be delivered to Ms. Penny the existing admission by the Social Security Administration on Chris Walters disability:

	"In March, 2000 the Social Security Administration Finding

	"You said you are disabled due to skin cancer, malignant 

	melanoma, GI disorder, frequent bowel movements, blood 

	clots in the legs and hepatitis. The medical shows that 

	you have a history of these problems":



	1. 	It shows that you have surgical excision of melanoma in 

		the past. There is no evidence of recurrence (**failed 

		to include reports on additional treatment). 



	2. 	It shows that you have been treated for intestinal problems 

		with frequent bowel movements. 



	3. 	You do have a mild edema and varicosities in your lower 

		extremities, but no ulcerations. 



	4. 	You should avoid direct exposure to sunlight. 



	5. 	You should also have access to restroom facilities






US District Court                       US District Court

Walters v Apfel				Walters V Williams

Case A:99CA015622			Case SA-97-CA-1313      

Judge Sam Sparks                        Judge Fred Biery

200 W 8th St                            655 E Durango

Austin, TX 78701                        San Antonio,TX  7820

(512) 916-5896                          (210-472-6550)



Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges-

Civil # 99-50174

Office of Clerk 5th 

US Circuit Court of Appeals

New Orleans, LA 

(504) 589-6514

Question of Violation
Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of Proceedings

1. Exhibit C"Notice of Denial of Public Assistance" delivered to Chris Walters by First Class United States Mail by Kathy Penny in Case 161526.

2. Have Officers of the Court erred in permitting Ms. Penny to make a further legal conveyance to Chris Walters to intimidate counsel over which appear the words "Mad" because she has been denied the further right to vend, dispense, and pratice and impersonator making arrest or search "Officer of the Court" in possible violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?

3. Have Officers of the Court erred in permitting Ms. Penny and North Carolina to make the following conveyance on Form DSS8109 12-2-01 "The State Disability Determination Section has determined that you are not to be disabled" where opposing counsel has the right to examine and challenge the veracity of evidence pursuant Federal Rules of Evidenceand it's admissability for instance which of the 55 doctors and past disability statements is North Carolina challenging?

4. Have Officers of the Court erred in permitting Ms. Penny to again make legal conveyances to counsel "You must be disabled according to the SSI definition of Disability" again citing, vending, and dispensing or making references to the US Codes in violation of Title 18 USC 402 Contempt?

5. Have Officers of the Court erred in permitting Ms. Penny to setaside the existing admission of Chris Walters disability by the Social Security Administration by tampering with a the offical findings of a federal agency in Title 18 USC 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees?

US District Court                       US District Court

Walters v Apfel				Walters V Williams

Case A:99CA015622			Case SA-97-CA-1313      

Judge Sam Sparks                        Judge Fred Biery

200 W 8th St                            655 E Durango

Austin, TX 78701                        San Antonio,TX  7820

(512) 916-5896                          (210-472-6550)



Reavley, Politz, and Jolly, Circuit Judges-

Civil # 99-50174

Office of Clerk 5th 

US Circuit Court of Appeals

New Orleans, LA 

(504) 589-6514

Question of Citation
For Contempt of Congress

1. Exhibit DAppellant Chris Walters filed complaints with the Federal Bureau of Investigations concerning hacking of "Evidence and Testimony" before Congress which are believed to have been subject of a denial of service type attack involving Forsyth County in October, 2001

2. Exhibit DAppellant Chris WaltersBrought the oversight in the application of the law to the attention of the Legal Counsel for US Department of Agriculture who replied in a timely and appropriate manner.

37. Exhibit DAppellant Chris Walters further provided legal notice to Legal Counsel for Forsyth County, North Carolina not to attempt to further contact Appellant but to refer any questions to the United States Attorney. Service was perfected upon:

Addressed Too:				

Davida W. Martin,			Peter S Brunstetter	

County Attorney 			Room 700, Hall of Justice

Hall of Justice, Room 704		Winston, Salem, NC 27101

Winston-Salem, NC 27101 		336-727-2779

336-727-2216 				brunstps@co.forsyth.nc.us

Discussion of the Merits
By President George Bush Jr.

President George W Bush upon taking public office suggested his administration was not interested in delving into problems in the Clinton Administration and in fact suggested such activities would seriously undermine his administration's efforts at bypartisanship. The Appellant Chris Walters being wrapped up the issues at hand and turned them over as policy issues addressed to the 107th US Congress to do whatever it is exactly that Congress does pursuant to Review by Legislative Committee

The appearance of these various 3rd parties occures in Forsyth County, in North Carolina during a state of national emergency or crisis in an on going attempt to resurrect legal questions from the Clinton Administration and step over several existing or standing Orders of Federal Judges and appears to go on to attempt to hack archives records-deemed property of Congress. While Congress does occassionally address as suggested from these letters concerning creation of Food Stamps for Homeless Act it does so very slowly as a general rule:

The Petitioner Chris Walters believes the Chief Judge of the 4th United States Circuit Court of Appeals is adequately prepared and empowered to address these issues and ascertain wheather the Officers of the United States District Court are disabled or otherwise hindered in the performance of their official duties:

Respectfully Submitted By

Chris Walters

Plaintiff Pro Se

PO Box 142

San Antonio,TX 78205

Citation of
Previous Acts of Congress

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515



TONY COELHO

15TH DISTRICT CALIFORNIA

MAJORITY WHIP



February 1, 1998



Mr. Chris Walters

c/o



Dear Mr. Walters:

I found your most recent letter to be encouraging. I am pleased that we are making headway in establishing national standard for the receipt of food stamps for the homeless. I am also encouraged by your comments that the USDA Inspector General will be giving your Complaints with regard to segregated meals more attention in the future. It looks as if your hard work and persistence is resulting in reform and increased attention to the plight of the homeless. I appreciate your keeping my office abreast of your developments.

If I can be of further assistance to you on these matters in the future, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely
Tony Coelho
Member of Congress TC/CW

THE HONORABLE MARK HATFIELD
Washington, D.C. 20510-10AM
WESTERN UNION MAILGRAM

1-128754U070004 03/10/88 ICS WA16612 SOTA

02873 MLTN VA 03/10/88 JN15212 



Chris Walters 

722 I Street 

Modesto, CA 95354

Thank you for your most recent correspondence regarding the homeless. I greatly appreciate your list of shelters on the West Coast Corridor which currently offer work placement services. When the Senate considered the urgent relief for the Homeless Act I added an amendment which would provide for case management to track and assist the homeless in obtaining comprehensive services, including job training. It is likely that this matter will come up during debate on welfare reform. Your interest and compassion are to commended.

Kind Regards 

MARK O HATFIELD, U.S.S. 

09134 18:02 EST

MGMCOMP

Certificate of Service

United States House

United States Senate

Removed Too:

U.S. Senate                 		US House of Represenatives

Judiciary, Select Sub			Judiciary Committee	

Committee on Intelligence		Ways and Means

Washington, D.C. 20510-6275             Washington,D.C.  20515

Removed From US Circuit Court of Appeals
9th,11th Circuits, & DC

Chris Walters          	)

Appellant Pro Se        )

			)       Civil Case 99-CV-668JR

			)       Judge Roberston Presiding

vs.                     )       USDC,DC       

			)

			)       Civil Case Number A- 99-CV-0156SS

Kenneth Apfel          	)       Judge Sam Sparks USDC,WDT

Commissioner          	)       Dismissed

of Social Security      )       

Appellee

Appellant's Reply Too
North Carolina State's Interrogatory

Addressed Too:

Mrs. Custer Worker 268			Kathy Penny	

Forsyth County 				Medicaid Caseworker

Department of Social Services		Department of Social Services

PO Box 999				PO Box 999

Winston-Salem, NC 27101			Winston-Salem, NC 27101

(727-2824)				(727-8331)



Dear Mrs Custer:

Dear Mrs Penny:

Thanks you for your inquiry on behalf of Forsyth County Department of Social Services and the State of North Carolina in processing my claim for food stamp benefits and medicare benefits pursuant to USDA regulations in Title USC 2011 food stamps. In the course of your my interviews I was instructed too secure additional disability statements and reapply for Social Security or SSI in the near future. I will briefly attempt to outline why these activities are prohibitied by Order of a United States District Court as cited pursuant too Title 1 Sec. 204. Codes and Supplements as evidence of the laws of United States

1. Exhibit A: Proof of Service on questions addressed too the US Senate and House Judiciary Committees cited 55 or more medical or doctors statements found at https://www.angelfire.com/id2/ssireform/index15.htm including disability statements or findings made in or by Florida State, Arizona, Washington State, and twice by Texas since 1997.

2. When applying for SSI I inquired why medical records appeared to be missing from the proceedings and the Social Security Inspector General David Williams explained in USDC Western District of Texas @ San Antonio Civil #SA-97-CA-1313 by and through US Attorney Gary Anderson too the Honorable USDC Judge Fred Biery. The Social Security Administration states it has the legal right to throw away medical records if it so wished because it is "soverign and immune" and can violate the law whenever it wished. The legal question was ended by requiring me to appear at a Social Security hearing held in Stockton, California to "make sure the hearing was held so far away I could not attend".

3. In Walter v. Social Security Commissioner Apfel filed USDC, WDT @ Austin, Texas Case A:99CA015622 I had asked the Honorable USDC Judge Sam Sparks if the Social Security Administration had the right to throw away medical records and disability determinations by states and require Chris Walters to appear in hearings thousands of miles from his residence. After consideration the Court accepted the SSI legal position that applicants do not have any right to the due process and equal protection of the law in SSI hearing until they reach the appellate level of a US District Court. The person holding my mail at the time explained that he received threatening phone calls from the Judge and decided to block delivery of Courts Order for 6 months to prevent a timely appeal.....

4. The question as to wheather I will choose to reapply for Social Security disability benefits is not a matter of legal obligation to the State of North Carolina State but a matter of my discretion acting only when adequately represented by adequate legal counsel.

Scope and Effect of the Law

As you might gather the United States has to date successfully defended 2 legal precedent that it is not entitled to Chris Walters medical records or disability statements. Because I couldn't understand exactly how you or other persons are supposed to preform your duties without medical records or disability statements and not wishing to question the constitutionality of the Social Security laws; I removed the matters to the US Senate and US House Judiciary Committees pursuant too Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing committees. These questions along with other matters were removed in a timely and law manner through US Circuits to Congress where they currently reside.

Unfortunatley, the finding and ruling of a United States District Court is final, absolute, and legally binding on everyone in the United States and it the law of the land as cited pursuant too Title 1 Sec. 204. Codes and Supplements as evidence of the laws of United States. As much as I might agree with your departments request the potential criminal penalities for obstructing a Department or Federal Court Order can be quite severe:

1. Tampering with or obstruction of federal court Orders is a violation of Title 18 CRIMES actionable under Title 18 USC 402 Contempt;

2. Tampering with proceedings before Departments of Congress is a violation of Title 18 CRIMES actionable under Title 18 USC Sec. 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees ;

3. Tampering with or in some wise joining US Appellate proceedings is a violation of several federal codes including Title 28 USC 372 Sec. 372. Retirement for disability; substitute judge on failure to retire; judicial discipline....:

I am not permitted to reply to your office any further regarding any of the matters outlined above and if your Department has any questions you should address them in writting too:

US Attorney				US Magistrate

US Department of Justice		United States District Court

200 W Broad St				251 N Main St

Statesville, NC 28677			Winston Salem, NC 27101

(704) 872-0043				(336-631-5007



Thanks for your consideration and patience:



Prepared By

Chris Walters, Appellant Pro Se

Food Stamp Claim 946371012

Medicaid 161526/169

PO Box 999

Winston, Salem, NC 27102-0999

Certificate of Service

I the Appellant Pro Se Christopher A. Walters do state and affirm that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document and attached exhibit was delivered October 8th, 2001 about 1:10 PM too the Department of Social Services addressed too: Mrs. Custer Worker 268 Forsyth County Department of Social Services PO Box 999 Winston-Salem, NC 27101 (727-2824) By _________________________Appellant Pro Se date 2001

United States House

United States Senate

Removed Too:

U.S. Senate                 		US House of Represenatives

Judiciary, Select Sub			Judiciary Committee	

Committee on Intelligence		Ways and Means

Washington, D.C. 20510-6275             Washington,D.C.  20515

Removed From US Circuit Court of Appeals
9th,11th Circuits, & DC

Chris Walters          	)

Appellant Pro Se        )

			)       Civil Case 99-CV-668JR

			)       Judge Roberston Presiding

vs.                     )       USDC,DC       

			)

			)       Civil Case Number A- 99-CV-0156SS

Kenneth Apfel          	)       Judge Sam Sparks USDC,WDT

Commissioner          	)       Dismissed

of Social Security      )       

Appellee

Appellant Motion To Strike
North Carolina State's 3rd Party Joinder

Addressed Too:

The Honorable Benjamin J White

United States Attorney

251 North Main St, Ste 505

Winston, Salem 27101

(336) 336-5268



Dear United States Attorney Benjamin J White:

1. Appellant's Exhibit A: I have appended a reply too a request from Forsyth County Department of Social Services & North Carolina pursuant too Title 1 Sec. 204. Codes and Supplements as evidence of the laws of United States which would violate a rather obscure and unique existing USDC Order in the course of processing a food stamp/medicaid request.

2. Appellant's Exhibit B: The matters and questions have been removed from US Circuit Courts to US House and Senate Judiciary Committees pursuant too Title 2 USC Sec. 190d. Legislative review by standing where they reside and there is no provision of law for 3rd party joinders before US Circuit Courts of Appeals or before Congress.

3. Any pleadings, documents, or other matters in appeal are appropriately submitted in written form by Appellee's Counsel the United States Attorney General or Congressional Counsel in a timely manner too:

Appellant Pro Se

Chris Walters

PO Box 142

San Antonio,TX  78205

US Senate Committee on JudiciaryCitation

US House Committee on JudiciaryCitation

Addressed Too:				

Davida W. Martin,			Peter S Brunstetter	

County Attorney 			Room 700, Hall of Justice

Hall of Justice, Room 704		Winston, Salem, NC 27101

Winston-Salem, NC 27101 		336-727-2779

336-727-2216 				brunstps@co.forsyth.nc.us

Question of Contempt of
107th US Congress

Dear Friend:

I'm counsel of record in a number of legal questions removed from the United States Courts of Appeals to the United States 107th Congress and couldn't help but to notice several apparent attempts to create unlawful 3rd party joinders or apparent attempts to Obstruct Congress by persons acting on behalf of or using equipment owned by Forsyth County. This courtsey brief has been prepared to assist Forsyth County to withdraw without penalty if it has appeared through misadventure and avoid contacting Counsel of Record again:

Jurisdictional Statment

The United States Congress under constitutional doctrine of "separation of powers" does not answer too any local, state or federal member of Government except on rare occassions by the United States Supreme Court and questions such as Contempts of Congress can be actionable:

1. Title 18 USC 4 Misprion the felony

2. Title 18 USC 402 Contempt

3. Title 18 USC 1505 Sec. 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Cause of Action

1. Exhibit C (weblink)A Courtsey brief prepared for local United States Attorney questions county employees attempting too praticing, vending, and dispending federal criminal law due to a defect in a federal code which it USDA has replied too and it is their responsibility too address. We advised your county workers that the matters have also been removed to the 107th Congress and 3rd party joinders are not permitted....

2. Exhibit BA formal complaint filed with a federal agency concerning email being blocked off a Forsyth County public access computer at about the same time we noted our questions to Congress website also blocked for about 24 hours

3. Exhibit CA formal complaint filed with a federal agency concerning a website being blocked off a Forsyth County public access computer about 6PM 10-28-2001 the websites being blocked off at Website was released within about 10 minutes suggesting the "Principal" has real time monitoring capabilities of county computers used by the public

4. Exhibit DA question wheather an anonomy exist at the Forsyth Public Library possibly due to virus or software problem where windows is attempting to read A drive without instructions from users.

5. Exhibit EA question filed outlines the history of internet hacking of websites containing questions addressed to Congress also found on the internetAddressed to Congressman Bob Barr and Chief Judges 9th and 1st US Circuit Courts of Appealsand .....

Scope and Purpose of
This Amicus Curiea Brief

1. United States v. Haldeman, Erlichman, DeanCounsels papers, and records are not open for public inspection. More recently a Judge on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals neutered a webmaster for attempting to monitor activities of Officers of the Court.

2. Federal Rules of Appellate Procedurecommunications too and from counsel; what may or may not be said; and the manner in which it is conveyied is governed and restricted by FRAP.

3. Title 18 USC 402 ContemptThe act of stalking harassing, obstructing counsel or vending dispensing or praticing federal law without a license or the expressed permission of a Federal Court are all prosecutable offenses. If you don't want a federal fugivite warrant issued for your arrest avoid any future communications with counsel of a legal nature; acts of stalking, or harassment.

4. Title 18 USC 1505 Sec. 1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees Most people are scared to death (and for good reason) of Congressional Committees and generally don't willing join themselves or their communities to them.

5. Reasonable Attorney Fees$25.00 an hour will be sought from Forsyth County for any further inconviences upon counsel.

If You Have Any Questions

									

Do not approach legal counsel but deliver them too:



The Honorable Richard Burr			United States Attorney

2000 West First St. 				PO Box 1858

Suite 508					Greensboro, NC 37402

Winston-Salem, NC 27104				(336-333-5351)

1-800-685-8916					(Fax 336) 333-5561

Prepared By Counsel of Record Chris Walters PO Box 142 San Antonio,TX 78205

Exhibits A

Date:		Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:18:11 -0400 

From:  		"Waldron, Patrick" 

		patrick.waldron@fns.usda.gov

Subject:  	RE: Question for Secretary of USDA 

To:  		legalcounsel@eudoramail.com

   

Dear Mr. Walters:



We have forwarded your message to our Office of General Counsel for review.



		-----Original Message-----

From: 		Legal Counsel 

		mailto:legalcounsel@eudoramail.com

Sent: 		Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:41 PM

To: 		fsphq-web@fns.usda.gov

Subject: 	Question for Secretary of USDA



Hello:  

We have encountered a question of a defect in the food stamp program in which food stamp workers in North Carolina appear to process food stamp cases by vending, dispensing, and praticing federal criminal law Title 18 Crimes apparently unaware the process was declared unconstitutional by a USDC in Texas in 1988. A courtsey brief has been delivered to the United States Attorney in Winston Salem, NC which is styled as a technical question of Chief Judge 4th US Circuit:

http://www.geocities.com/questionofcontempt/4th.html

With Kindest Regards Counsel of Record

Exhibits B

Thank You:      Thank you for taking the time to complete a complaint with the IFCC. Your complaint has been successfully submitted. Please retain the following information for future contacts with the IFCC Complaint number:  I01101210477151 Password:  deleted If you have any additional information to provide to the IFCC please use the following link and log in with the above complaint number and password. https://www.ifccfbi.gov/update   IFCC Home

Exhibit C

Thank You:      Thank you for taking the time to complete a complaint with the IFCC. Your complaint has been successfully submitted. Please retain the following information for future contacts with the IFCC Complaint number:  I01102218033037 Password:  deleted If you have any additional information to provide to the IFCC please use the following link and log in with the above complaint number and password. https://www.ifccfbi.gov/update   IFCC Home

Exhibit D Computer Anomoly Noted at Forsyth Library

1. When a patron uses the internet connection at the library the computer begins to search for the A Drive wheather it has been given instructions to do so or not.

2. Since computers do not normally search for the A Drive without instructions we might be seeing a virus; software problem; or something else.

              

Date:  		Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:00:33 -0400 

From:  		"Don Dwiggins" 

		dwiggidr@atlas.forsyth.lib.nc.us

Subject:  	Re: Question of problems with library computers 

Organization:  	Forsyth County 

To:  		legalcounsel@eudoramail.com 

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I ahev passed the information along to our IT for follow up.

Exhibit E

[Multiple embedded ads forbidden]

Thank You:      Thank you for taking the time to complete a complaint with the IFCC. Your complaint has been successfully submitted. Please retain the following information for future contacts with the IFCC Complaint number:  I01102713375871 Password:  deleted If you have any additional information to provide to the IFCC please use the following link and log in with the above complaint number and password. https://www.ifccfbi.gov/update   IFCC Home

Certificate of Service on
107th US Congress....

A draft and courtsey copy of the foregoing document was delivered to the Forsyth County Attorney in Winston Salem, NC on or about 10-26-2001:

Reciept From Senate Judiciary Committee

Date:           Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:32:34 -0400 

From:           senator_hatch@hatch.senate.gov 

Subject:       	Re:Question On Genocide 

To:             legalcounsel@eudoramail.com

This is an automatic response generated by my Internet mail system to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail message.

I appreciate the views and suggestions of citizens and want to thank you for taking the time to write. As you might expect, however, the convenience of e-mail has increased the volume of constituent communications significantly, and I regret that I am unable to respond personally if you are not a Utah resident.

If you are a Utah constituent, and you have included your postal mailing address with your e-mail message, I will respond to your concerns as quickly as possible via U.S. mail.

Again, I appreciate your views and your interest in matters of public policy.

Sincerely,

Orrin G. Hatch

United States Senator

Reciept From Senate Judiciary Committee

Date:          	Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:00:14 -0400 

From:          	Senator@biden.senate.gov 

Subject:      	Re: Question 

To:            	legalcounsel@eudoramail.com

Thank you for your e-mail message. I appreciate having the benefit of your views.

This response is an acknowledgement that we received your message and will make note of your comments. Delawareans seeking a further response who have included a postal address in their message will receive a reply via U.S. mail as soon as possible. NOTE: Because we have occasional problems with our e-mail system, Delawareans seeking immediate assistance are urged to call my office in Wilmington (302) 573-6345.

For more information about the work I do as a Senator for Delaware, please visit my web site at http://biden.senate.gov.

Sincerely,

Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

United States Senator